- From: Loirooriol via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 21:58:51 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Loirooriol has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-position] Does position:fixed create a stacking context? == >From [Minutes Telecon 2015-07-01](https://www.w3.org/blog/CSS/2015/07/02/minutes-telecon-252/): > **Resolved**: Make `position: fixed` a full stacking context > - Rossen will write the text change in place it in the [Positioning](http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-position/) spec. Bert will then take the same text and add it as an errata to [CSS 2](http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css2/cover.html). I found the changes in the [CSS 2 spec](https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/changes.html#s.9.9.1). However, the definition of [`z-index: auto`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-position/#valdef-z-index-auto) in CSS Position does not have that change, and I can't find anything which explains that `position: fixed` creates a stacking context. Did the WG change their minds? Did Rossen forgot to update CSS Position? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/451 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2016 21:59:03 UTC