Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] should the >> syntax for the descendant combinator still exist?

I think that would have been a fine argument when CSS1 was being 
developed, but I believe at this point having two syntaxes for the 
same thing would reduce clarity.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Ms2ger
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/641#issuecomment-256056215 
using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2016 14:48:54 UTC