- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 07:15:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Keep in mind that we're clamping a minimum size! Not the actual size. :) Defining it in terms of `max-width/height` wouldn't make any sense. (And the interaction with `max-width/height` isn't underdefined: `max-width/height` reduces the automatic minimum if necessary, that's clearly specified in the definition.) The specified size is a maximum on that minimum -- it's there so that if the specified size is less than the intrinsic size, then we use the specified size as the minimum instead. A specified size doesn't increase the automatic minimum: we take the most conservative minimum as the automatic minimum, so it's min(specified size, content size) if there's a specified size and min(transferred size, content size) if there isn't but there's an aspect ratio, and simply content size if neither specified size nor transferred size exist. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/767#issuecomment-263106346 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 27 November 2016 07:15:50 UTC