- From: Mats Palmgren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 22:11:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Also, are you sure you really mean `normal` in those places? The text makes more sense to me if you replace `normal` with `stretch` there, i.e. "Otherwise, when `align-self` is not `stretch`, and not `normal` behaving as `stretch`, ...". Currently, it seems to say that an explicit `align-self:stretch` should have `fit-content` sizing, which seems odd. I'd expect it to have `fill-available` sizing. -- GitHub Notification of comment by MatsPalmgren Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/682#issuecomment-258560419 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 4 November 2016 22:11:48 UTC