- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:53:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> @SebastianZ > > This may actually be replaced by > > <image># [ normal | none | <content-list> ] [/ <string> ]? > > No, it can't: > > - # means one or more times but original syntax allows image list to be omitted, i.e. zero or more times should be used > - original syntax says that <image> list should be followed by comma, in your variant the comma after the list is prohibited You're right. So, forget what I just wrote. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/663#issuecomment-257516862 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2016 08:53:29 UTC