- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:12:38 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@dbaron I agree on your list of fairly stable but beware specs (maybe not ruby), but how about also including css-break? implementation is somewhat spotty, but the spec itself seems to me to be in good shape, and quoting the introduction: > The primary audience is CSS implementers, not CSS authors, as this definition includes modules by specification stability, not Web browser adoption rate. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/826#issuecomment-268743342 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2016 08:12:40 UTC