- From: Johannes Wilm via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:52:12 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Florian Rivoal <notifications@github.com> wrote: > Whether we should include it *now* is an separate question, but we need > to address it eventually, so this issue is to track that need. > Maybe. The thing is that if we want browsers to implement the spec, then we cannot ask for complexity that will let it take several minutes before the end user can see their webpage. If I recall correctly, I think we previiously said that page floats can in reality be replaced by a combination of Exclusions + absolute positioning + JavaScript, and that the provided page floats should therefore only be the simple kinds that browsers could provide natively. > For now, it may be sufficient to make sure that whatever we're specifying > is forward compatible with what we'll eventually want. That is a fuzzy > thing, since what we eventually want isn't really defined, but we should > probably think about it a bit still. > > If it was in early version of the spec, do you have a link to the best / > latest version to include it, to get a sense of what has already been > proposed on this topic? > Håkon's Figure Spec: https://figures.spec.whatwg.org/#floating-inside-and-outside-pages > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/812#issuecomment-268153029>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAkWOMkn_qvzOyzJ1057z-ZyMUL5bokfks5rJ1uUgaJpZM4LO9jB> > . > -- Johannes Wilm http://www.johanneswilm.org tel US: +1 (520) 399 8880 tel NO: +47 94109013 tel DE: +49 176 370 18082 -- GitHub Notification of comment by johanneswilm Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/812#issuecomment-268177952 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2016 07:52:35 UTC