- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:50:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Afaict this would mean fixing the contradiction in favor of the second clause in this sentence, not the first. Ah, sorry, I misunderstood this is about _line_ box (item 3 of 10.8) when I replied before. For _inline_ box, the code looks like it tries to get max of ascent/descent of all used fonts in the inline box, but I didn't stepped through them. Your test indicated only from the first available font? Is the larger ascent of fallback font supposed to be cut? -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/391#issuecomment-239739606 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 15 August 2016 06:51:05 UTC