- From: WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:21:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
wargrey has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [selectors] some inconsistent concepts and descriptions == https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#syntax https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#simple https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors/#grammar 1. Are **pseudo elements** _simple elements_? > Pseudo-elements do not exist independently in the tree: they are always bound to another element on the page, called their originating element. > Syntactically, a pseudo-element immediately follows the compound selector representing its originating element. If this compound selector is omitted, it is assumed to be the universal selector *. Only the grammar defines **pseudo elements** are _simple elements_, this is okay syntactically. Also, is it only one **pseudo element** that can be attached to the **originating element**? If it is not, do they share the same **originating element**(rather than, say, the 2nd one is the **originating element** of the 3rd one)? 2. **Pseudo classes** must follow the **elemental selector** if present. This change is not mentioned in the grammar section. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/386 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 6 August 2016 08:23:31 UTC