Re: International identity data standards?

Hi everyone,

FYI, my company is working with the UPU, a UN agency that handles 
inter-postal operator collaborations, and they have expressed interest 
in DIDs and VCs. I can't say more until all the approvals are in place 
(compliance for intergovernmental agencies is quite complex), but there 
are international postal addressing standards in place, such as the S42 
standard <http://www.upu.int/en/activities/addressing/s42-standard.html> 
for physical addressing. There is also work ongoing - like the UPU's S68 
and DeutschePost's POSTIDENT standards - that propose international 
standards for identity and trust data.

I'll be able to talk more about all of this shortly, which will likely 
have a significant impact on the DID initiative. There are a lot of 
moving parts.

Anyway, I can talk some about this effort off the record during the 
Prague workshop.

Moses


On 8/26/19 11:56 PM, MXS Insights wrote:
> If it is specifically mailing address standards, I have contacts at 
> Pitney Bowes (having worked there for 20+ years).  They have been 
> doing global mailing address hygiene for 40+ years.
>
> I am happy to reach out to find someone to connect here if there is a 
> point of contact I can connect them to.
>
> Michael Shea.
>
>> On Aug 27, 2019, at 7:10 AM, Ian Smith <ian@vidicode.pro 
>> <mailto:ian@vidicode.pro>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think ldap proposed or Canadian standards are at all 
>> appropriate for international addresses. Alibaba's enlightened but 
>> not progressive approach was to allow several thousand characters and 
>> no formatting restrictions to allow people to write their address. A 
>> typical mailing address in India and China is around 30 to 100 words.
>>
>> The ISO has a series of standards on how the various character sets 
>> can be transcribed to printable characters.
>>
>> Google is probably the forerunner in displaying addresses, but they 
>> do things that are hard for the rest of us to mimic. A few minutes 
>> looking at Google maps in Africa and Bangladesh should be fairly 
>> impressive.
>>
>> Is there additional progress supporting unicode-16 in ldap standards?
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 10:53 PM =Drummond Reed 
>> <drummond.reed@evernym.com <mailto:drummond.reed@evernym.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Love it, Anil. Sounds like a job for...Verifiable Credentials!
>>
>>     =Drummond
>>
>>     On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 9:38 AM John, Anil <anil.john@hq.dhs.gov
>>     <mailto:anil.john@hq.dhs.gov>> wrote:
>>
>>         /Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; /: -)
>>
>>         <StandardizingIdentityOrAccessControlAttributes>
>>
>>         <Recurrence>Every-3-5-Years</Recurrence>
>>
>>         <DiscussionType>Swirling-Whirlpool-of-Doom</DiscussionType>
>>
>>         <Action>Avoid-Flaming-Arrows-Sit-Back-Hold-On-Enjoy-Ride</Action>
>>
>>         </ StandardizingIdentityOrAccessControlAttributes >
>>
>>         Best Regards,
>>
>>         -Anil
>>
>>         Anil John
>>
>>         Technical Director, Silicon Valley Innovation Program
>>
>>         Science and Technology Directorate
>>
>>         US Department of Homeland Security
>>
>>         Washington, DC, USA
>>
>>         Email Response Time – 24 Hours
>>
>>         https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/svip
>>
>>         *From:*Liam McCarty <liam@unumid.org <mailto:liam@unumid.org>>
>>         *Sent:* Friday, August 23, 2019 3:26 PM
>>         *To:* public-vc-comments@w3.org
>>         <mailto:public-vc-comments@w3.org>; public-credentials@w3.org
>>         <mailto:public-credentials@w3.org>
>>         *Subject:* International identity data standards?
>>
>>         Hi all,
>>
>>         Is there work being done to create international standards
>>         for identity data? For example, it would clearly be valuable
>>         to have standards for common data points like name, address,
>>         phone number, etc. If not that, it'd be helpful to at least
>>         have standardized mappings between different regional formats.
>>
>>         I've done some preliminary research and discovered groups
>>         like the NIEM (National Information Exchange Model, which is
>>         U.S.-based) and UPU (Universal Postal Union), but not
>>         anything more comprehensive. If international standards
>>         already exist, could someone point me in the right direction?
>>
>>         If not, creating international identity data standards seems
>>         like a natural extension of the work on DIDs and VCs. Would
>>         love to help kickstart that if people would find it useful.
>>
>>
>>         *Liam McCarty*
>>
>>         Co-Founder of ePluribus <https://epluribus.io/>, Unum ID
>>         <https://unumid.org/>
>>
>> <image002.png>
>

-- 

*Moses Ma | Managing Partner*

moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com | moses@ngenven.com

v+1.415.568.1068 | skype mosesma | /linktr.ee/moses.tao/ 
<http://linktr.ee/moses.tao>

FutureLab provides strategy, ideation and technology for breakthrough 
innovation and third generation blockchains.

Learn more at /www.futurelabconsulting.com/ 
<http://futurelabconsulting.com>. For calendar invites, please cc: 
mosesma@gmail.com


Or whet your appetite by reading /Agile Innovation/ 
<http://www.amazon.com/Agile-Innovation-Revolutionary-Accelerate-Engagement/dp/B00SSRSZ9A> 
| /Blockchain Design Sprint/ 
<https://www.amazon.com/Blockchain-Design-Sprint-Workbook-Implement/dp/1548592714> 
| my blog at /psychologytoday.com/ 
<http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-tao-innovation>.

Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2019 20:15:43 UTC