Re: A tangent, but maybe an interesting one?

Cross-posting with VRM for obvious reasons.

The DID ecosystem, like many of our systems, will need to be hardened
through agency for the individuals. Agency has a number of challenges
including:

- ownership of the technology
- transparency of the technology
- accessibility of the tech to diverse populations
- governance of the developers
- governance of the standards groups
- governance of the policy bundles that initialize the technology
- licensure of experts to install and service the technology
- management of reputation in a specified context

Yes, we need our agents to be AI-enabled, but we can start with simpler
stuff like ad-blockers and authorization servers. Here's one perspective on
the AI piece I wrote for doctors but it works for everyone in the long run
http://bit.ly/HMS78Talk

Adrian

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Katryna Dow <katryna.dow@meeco.me> wrote:

> Hi Moses,
>
> I’m the Chair of IEEE’s #P7006 - the standard for a single (human) AI is
> exactly what we’re working on.
>
> One of the aims is for the AI to be able to process T&Cs or “offers” and
> assess bias and downstream consequences.
>
> If your interested in contributing to the work, let me know.
> Katryna
>
>
> [image: Meeco] <http://www.meeco.me/>
> *Katryna Dow *CEO & Founder, Meeco
> Australia: +61 418 538 404 <+61%20418%20538%20404>  USA: +1 201 942 0009
> <+1%20201%20942%200009>
> UK: +44 7408 854 221 <+44%207408%20854%20221> katryna.dow@meeco.me
> Twitter: @katrynadow <https://twitter.com/katrynadow>
> LinkedIn: katrynadow <http://www.linkedin.com/in/katrynadow>
> Skype: katryna.dow
>
>
> Discover Meeco at meeco.me <http://www.meeco.me/>
> Follow us on twitter @meeco_me <https://twitter.com/meeco_me> and blog.
> meeco.me
>
> On 16 Jun 2018, at 12:04, Moses Ma <moses.ma@futurelabconsulting.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I just wrote an article about psychometrics — the stuff Cambridge
> Analytica used — and how it might interact with decentralized ID.
>
> See: https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/the-tao-
> innovation/201806/the-psychometrics-decentralization
>
> I'm wondering if there might be some way to harden the DID system against
> manipulative psychometrics. I mean, beyond non-correlation. In the article,
> I proposed a fanciful intelligent assistant app, like a Siri for the forces
> of good, that knows your psychometric type, and whenever something looked
> manipulative in an ad or in your Facebook feed, it could check to see the
> reputation of the poster and warn you.
>
> However, this would require a framework for reputation. Instead, I'm
> thinking there may be something easier and simpler.
>
> For example, instead of requiring some proof of work – via Equihash - to
> post something, how about using Equihash to make it through your spam
> filter? Or better yet, send a few cents to a charitable cause, to make it
> into your feed, ad queue, inbox.
>
> You have any ideas?
>
> Moses
>
> PS, if you could retweet these articles, I'd appreciate it:
>
>    - https://twitter.com/mosesma/status/1007328677892272128
>    - https://twitter.com/mosesma/status/1007289955486322688
>
>
>
>


-- 

Adrian Gropper MD

PROTECT YOUR FUTURE - RESTORE Health Privacy!
HELP us fight for the right to control personal health data.
DONATE: https://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-3/