- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:39:48 -0400
- To: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>, "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 09/12/2017 05:13 PM, Adam Sobieski wrote: > I’m exploring and sketching some ideas with regard to verifiable > text-based claims. > > https://w3c-ccg.github.io/verifiable-news/sketchpad.html > > Questions, comments and suggestions welcomed. I don't have a lot of time to review right now but I noticed that the data modeling needs work -- `claim` should point at a node in the graph with an identifier for the "thing" that the claim is about. One approach could be for that node to include the ID (url) for the article, some type information, and the content of the article. But that's really just asserting that some things were said in an article. Other approaches that have been considered focus on using schema.org Reviews with links and timestamp/hash information on what was reviewed and some "truthiness" measure. Hashes are tricky as the content may change due to minor editorial updates. -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc. http://digitalbazaar.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 19:40:11 UTC