- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 16:43:13 -0400
- To: Kim Hamilton Duffy <kim@learningmachine.com>, "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>, "W3C Digital Verification CG (Public List)" <public-digital-verification@w3.org>
On 09/09/2017 01:59 PM, Kim Hamilton Duffy wrote: > TL;DR Moving DID Spec toward a proof/capabilities model I have attempted to triage the list of bugs Kim listed in the Agenda, plus references to suggested changes, into a logical order that will resolve the low-level issues before we tackle the higher-level ones here: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/issues/21 The hope is that if we proceed in this order that the higher-level issues may resolve themselves or become easier to solve as we make decisions on the lower-level issues. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/
Received on Saturday, 9 September 2017 20:43:38 UTC