Re: Credentials CG charter vote result

Sounds great. I will make it so.
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:48 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> On 10/21/2017 12:01 PM, Kim Hamilton Duffy wrote:
> > Applied to me, the "malice"/"incompetence" quote is entirely valid
> > :) -- I simply thought I was updating the charter in the correct
> > location. Not an ounce of disrespect was behind that action, just
> > incompetence. :)
>
> No, not incompetence - the Chairs did exactly what was required of them
> per the CG Process. There was a formal decision made by consensus in the
> group to replace the charter with the new charter.
>
> Tim, that you didn't realize this was happening is unfortunate, and
> that you think more changed than what has actually changed in reality is
> a disconnect. That's all. We're all working towards the same goals.
>
> > Can I ask for your help in outlining and implementing a solution to
> > your concerns?
>
> When W3C Charters are modified, the group can optionally include a link
> to previous versions of the charter. I suggest we do that in this case
> so folks like Tim can find the old charter.
>
> Something along these lines:
>
> """
> This charter was ratified by group consensus on <DATE>. The
> [https://..../ previous revision] of the Credentials Community Group
> Charter is also available for archival and auditing purposes.
> """
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built
> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/
>
-- 
Kim Hamilton Duffy
CTO & Principal Architect Learning Machine
Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group
400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139

kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu
425-652-0150 | LearningMachine.com