On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 at 22:28 Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19 October 2017 at 08:57, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> This article "The electricity required for a single Bitcoin trade could >> power a house for a whole month[1]" helps to illustrate some important >> qualities that are built-into some strategies employed to solve significant >> problems as they relate to right to life into the future. >> >> I imagine this type of thing is categorised as 'out of scope' within W3C >> Land? >> >> Please confirm. >> > > The CG has a charter > > https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/charter/ > yup. thank you for the reminder. > > > There is also a block chain CG which may like to discuss energy usage of > the block chain and consensus mechanisms. Energy was just the first, this > will change over time. > some issues are out of scope of w3c afaik. currently working to see how https://www.isoc-bsig.org/ might have more local engagement, noting also the IEEE related work; but thanks. i'll make further notes in that group, where applicable. >> >> >> TIm. >> >> [1] >> https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/10/the-electricity-required-for-a-single-bitcoin-trade-could-power-a-house-for-a-whole-month >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 11:41:55 UTC