W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > November 2017

DID Spec Closure #1 meeting tomorrow

From: Susan Bradford <susan.bradford@evernym.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:10:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAk2kKYAAyiyTzLZD+1WF4NPc+GjAH7NaHt5E8wgg37aCf=z5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-credentials@w3.org
Wed, Nov 22 11:00 am MST.

Join the IRC channel for notes during the meeting.
Chat: http://irc.w3.org/?channels=ccg

The meeting will be a Zoom call.
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/144377904

Or iPhone one-tap :
    US: +16465588656,,144377904#  or +16699006833,,144377904#
Or Telephone:
    Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
        US: +1 646 558 8656  or +1 669 900 6833
    Meeting ID: 144 377 904
    International numbers available:

You need to become members for the W3C Intellectual Property Release in
order to avoid submarine patents. This is now very important since it looks
like the DID Spec is going to happen at W3C.
Please join the CCG and do the IPR release (click the "Join this Group"
button on this page: https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/

Susan Bradford

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Kim Hamilton Duffy <
kim@learningmachine.com> wrote:

> Building on Manu's point about proposals, I think we'd be most productive
> dividing the changes into themes/categories, each of which would be
> elaborated on in a proposal. Some I identified:
>    - service descriptions
>    - serialization formats
>    - key descriptions
>    - tightening up timestamp semantics
> Several of these require advance work: e.g. we need to identify use cases
> for service descriptions, we need input about IPID for serialization
> formats, ... so I think some advance preparation would make these meetings
> (and our communication around them) more effective.
> I would gladly lead (or co-lead) the key descriptions part.
> Thanks,
> Kim
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:57 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
> wrote:
>> On 11/15/2017 11:41 AM, Susan Bradford wrote:
>> > The agenda for each call will be set by the editors and will be
>> > limited to discussion of the open issues in the order of priority the
>> > editors have determined based on feedback from contributors.
>> A few of us in the US won't be able to make it due to the Thanksgiving
>> holiday. If we could provide an Agenda to the group, we can get
>> preliminary feedback on issues for those that won't be able to attend.
>> To put it another way, if we could get PROPOSALS for changes to the spec
>> in advance of the meeting next week, Drummond could get an idea of where
>> there is consensus and where there isn't. One of the issues w/ having
>> meetings around holidays is that if people don't show up, and you make a
>> decision, the decision is almost immediately undone when you find out
>> that the people that weren't there disagreed with the decision.
>> The other way to do that is to make decisions based on consensus of
>> attendees preliminary pending a 7-14 day waiting period to see if there
>> are objections to the decisions. All decisions would be published to the
>> mailing list for broader feedback and when it's clear that there are no
>> objections (after 7-14 days) do you ratify the decision.
>> -- manu
>> --
>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>> blog: The State of W3C Web Payments in 2017
>> http://manu.sporny.org/2017/w3c-web-payments/
>> --
> Kim Hamilton Duffy
> CTO & Principal Architect Learning Machine
> Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group
> 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139
> kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu
> 425-652-0150 <(425)%20652-0150> | LearningMachine.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:58:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:42 UTC