W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2017

Re: Terminology poll (updated)

From: David Chadwick <D.W.Chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:40:21 +0100
To: public-credentials@w3.org
Message-ID: <ca5d683f-1ac9-77f9-b5ca-8351eb214775@kent.ac.uk>
Ok thanks, explanation accepted

regards

David

On 28/06/2017 14:23, Manu Sporny wrote:
> On 06/28/2017 06:08 AM, David Chadwick wrote:
>> But in the list in the playground, Subject is not an alternative for
>>  Role-C. The nearest you have is Subject's Agent, and your original 
>> sentence still does not make sense when using that :-)
> 
> When I wrote the email, Subject was an option.
> 
> Then, yesterday, the VCWG rejected Subject as an option during the call
> and the playground was updated as a result. Thus removing Subject as an
> option.
> 
> So, yes, we could simplify the language now, but the poll has started
> and so we shouldn't modify the language while the poll is operating.
> 
> Are we having fun yet? :)
> 
>>> I'm not making the change because of this reason
>>
>> So I do not think it is a valid reason for rejecting the change
> 
> It was a valid reason at the time, and then shortly after the VCWG
> meeting it became an invalid reason. :)
> 
> We can word smith the language /after/ the poll is done before it goes
> in the specification (or after).
> 
> In short - there is plenty of time to make the modification that you
> suggested. We just shouldn't make it while the poll is running. I'll try
> to remember the language modification when I update the spec next, and
> if I fail to do so, I hope you will catch it and raise an issue.
> 
> -- manu
> 
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2017 21:41:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:39 UTC