Re: Proposal for Credentials CG to maintain registries for DID Methods, Linked Data Key Types, and Credential Status Method

Kim, I'm fine with Proposal 1, I think it's very well done.

And on Proposal 2, I'm good with the DID Methods registry. But I don't
understand the other two, so I'd love to hear more about them on tomorrow's
call.

Thanks,

=Drummond

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Kim Hamilton Duffy <
kim@learningmachine.com> wrote:

> In last Tuesday's Credentials CG call, we put out proposals for the
> Credentials CG to adopt a registry creation/update process for 3 specific
> registries*.
>
> To summarize, there are two proposals on the table.
>
> PROPOSAL 1: Adopt the registry creation and update process for the
>             Credentials Community Group.
>
> PROPOSAL 2: Adopt the Credentials CG as the registry maintainer for
>             the DID Methods, Linked Data Key Types, and Credential
>             Status Method Registries.
>
> Complete details are in Manu's email to the group (Details: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2017Dec/0020.html)
>
> Please let us know by tomorrow's calls if you have any objections to these proposals.
>
> ** note: this is 3 as opposed to 2, as accidentally stated in the call*
>
> -- Kim Duffy, on behalf of Credentials CG chairs
> --
> Kim Hamilton Duffy
> CTO & Principal Architect Learning Machine
> Co-chair W3C Credentials Community Group
> 400 Main Street Building E19-732, Cambridge, MA 02139
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=732,+Cambridge,+MA+02139&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> kim@learningmachine.com | kimhd@mit.edu
> 425-652-0150 <(425)%20652-0150> | LearningMachine.com
>