W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > September 2016

Re: JSON License | Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX)

From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:15:53 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM1Sok3_POMRoJahnE=EsPVVd-Km-SJ=cu=QX57FnCkY6-K9NQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "David I. Lehn" <dil@lehn.org>
Cc: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
Well that's a disgusting response attached to your persona.

Perhaps you haven't been following the work I've been carrying out,
involving, amongst other things, support for establishing the credentials
cg as issues such as privacy could not be well handled in the payments cg
incorporation credentials work.

Hope your day feels better now.

I'll consider my response to you further throughout the day.

On Fri., 23 Sep. 2016, 3:16 am David I. Lehn, <dil@lehn.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Timothy Holborn
> <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is json-ld subject to the json license?
> >
> > It clearly states "The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil."
> >
> > Sounds like a wonderfully short yet capable legal concept..
> >
> > https://spdx.org/licenses/JSON
> Those license terms and implications have been discussed elsewhere at
> length for many years.  Please, lets keep this list about the
> credentials specs.  As stated in the spec [1], JSON-LD uses JSON as
> detailed in RFC4627 (now obsoleted by RFC7159).  If you believe there
> is an issue please move this discussion to an appropriate legal forum
> and/or consult your legal counsel.  Thanks.
> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/
> -dave
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2016 23:16:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:31 UTC