W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > October 2016

Re: Verifiable Claims WG Proposal progresses to next stage

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 17:14:14 -0400
To: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
Cc: Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <beb9fc8f-fa63-9407-ea5b-a6f7555ecbfc@digitalbazaar.com>
On 10/03/2016 04:30 PM, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> This phase of review is actually with the W3C membership, after an 
> "advance notice of charter work in progress." 
> https://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#WGCharterDevelopment

Thanks for the clarification, Wendy. I've started noting this in the
communication that is going out to set expectations.

Given that we've circulated this charter proposal among the AC before,
how long to do you expect the upcoming official W3C Membership review
period to last? I know that's difficult to predict, as W3C Membership
feedback varies in scope, timing, and volume.

> I'm preparing that notice to the membership and public now. What URL
>  should I use to refer to the charter-in-development, as the link
> from the VCTF info page, https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/
> still goes to an older version, 
> https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/charter/

The link has been updated to point to the latest charter, so please
share the following link in the notice:


> Shall we invite discussion on the public-webpayments-ig list or a 
> different mailing list?

We asked that previous input be sent to:


The Charter proposal has been updated accordingly. Unless the WPIG
Chairs and Staff Contact would prefer an alternate email address, I
suggest we re-use that one.

>> 2. W3C Management Review (1-2 weeks)
> This will come after member comments (if any), and work with the TF 
> and membership to respond and identify potential chairs.

We have three people that have volunteered to be Chairs for the work -
Richard Varn from ETS, Matt Stone from Pearson, and Dan Burnett as an IE
(who most recently was spec editor for WebRTC at W3C).

We will discuss these suggestions at the VCTF call tomorrow. Is there
anything else that's necessary to surface these preferences to W3M?

> Thanks for your work and for your responsiveness to questions and 
> concerns.

And thank you for your engagement throughout this process and
formulation of the notice to the W3C Membership and public. :)

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 21:14:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:32 UTC