- From: Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:31:34 -0400
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
- Cc: "public-webpayments-ig@w3.org" <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
On 03/15/2016 03:00 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > On 15 March 2016 at 19:54, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com > <mailto:shane@halindrome.com>> wrote: > > I am not sure what to say. I heard a strong requirement from the > group on the call today that this be included. As far as I know, > all this means is that credentials (aka claims) need to have a well > defined data format that is transportable. The repository for a > claim could be a folder fill of .json files on a disk, right? Or > some fancy service provider. The claims and their integrity are not > dependent upon the repository. > > > Let me clarify slightly. > > If this simply means that the serialization reuses web standards such as > JSON LD and Linked data then im +1, because that's portable by nature. > > If it means that the subject of those data structures requires the use a > URI scheme other then HTTP (e.g. the did: scheme) URIs, that's the point > I'd like to push back on. There is no requirement for that to happen. To give an example of how this might work with a WebID (but note that no technologies have been chosen yet), suppose that if you have some third party claims about the subject "https://example.com/people#melvin". You currently store those at "https://credbank.com", but now you'd like to move them to "https://best.credrepo.com". You can do that without having the claims reissued. The identifier you use for yourself has nothing to do with it. Your identifier can be *independent* of the services that issue claims to you and so can the repository where you store those claims. -- Dave Longley CTO Digital Bazaar, Inc. http://digitalbazaar.com
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:32:05 UTC