Re: Drafty VCTF Use Cases

Apologies for meeting tonight.

On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 at 1:58 AM, <brian.sletten@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have been sick too. I am not going to make the call but I will take a
> look at this. Thanks.
>
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 3:15 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
>
> I assume there is a VCTF meeting tomorrow.  My action was to update the
> use cases document into the new IG VCTF space in preparation for a tight
> coupling between it and the draft verifiable claims charter. The charter
> has not yet made it into this space - I know that Manu has been moving
> house AND been ill, so I imagine he is just a tad behind.  But the draft
> use-cases are up at http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/use-cases/
>
> Please have a look in anticipation of discussing these tomorrow and over
> the coming week.
>
> Caveat: I did this work with little consultation from my fellow editors.
> That's completely my fault, and they all have my permission to publicly
> berate me for it.   Or better yet, make edits or submit pull requests.
>
> P.S. There has been a lot of discussion of additional use cases on the
> community group mailing list.  I love those discussions - let's keep them
> going!  This document is necessarily limited as the subset that will
> support the initial work we want to do as a working group AND designed to
> not overwhelm the reader.  So if you don't see your favorite scenario or
> requirement, it will be in the supporting "extended use cases" document in
> CG space.  If you feel strongly that it should be exposed in this limited
> space, or that tweaking one scenario will get it covered now, please let me
> know!
>
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 15:00:41 UTC