W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > June 2016

Re: VOTE: Verifiable Claims Terminology

From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:45:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM1Sok0PLGSCs0cvaV5OpSJwdx1FCFzVFzdGaXVpm6bRScvp6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, public-credentials@w3.org
Maybe put it to vote.  I know it's inconvenient.  Quick +1 on the list
might do it.

Also check with Henry his reviewed the material and is putting in his best
effort.  Genius, but busy.  I'm hoping he can prioritize or give caveats.

Also Melvin should voice up imho.

Tim.h.

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, 2:32 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> On 06/10/2016 12:23 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> > For "Consumer/Inspector/Relying Party/etc."
> >
> > why not Guard? That's how we named it for WebID-TLS
> >
> https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/tls/#authentication-sequence
>
> ... because no one mentioned it until just now. :(
>
> The poll is already going and I can't stop it. A few people have already
> voted.
>
> If we go through another terminology vote in the future (which I'm
> almost certain we will), we can add Guard at that point. I didn't know
> WebID had switched to that terminology.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching
> https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/
>
>
Received on Friday, 10 June 2016 08:45:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 July 2018 21:19:29 UTC