- From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 08:07:58 -0700
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, Web Payments IG <public-webpayments-ig@w3.org>
On 6/7/16 8:00 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > 1. If you propose something, make sure that you're the champion for > that term. Don't suggest something that you wouldn't want as the #1 > pick. Based on Manu's interesting rules of voting, I hereby retract "Reader". I only proposed it yesterday and would need to consider it my #1, and make a case against the others. But seeing David Chadwick's explanation for "Relying Party", which I accept, I now prefer that term. I suggest ignoring "Reader" in the considerations and voting unless someone else decides to champion it with new reasoning. Steven > 2. If you propose something, make an argument for the use of that term > and an argument against all of the other terms. > 3. Don't send "me too" emails. If you want to weigh in, please make > sure you're making an argument that no one else has made in order to > cut down on the number of emails sent to the mailing list. > > We are going to collect input until midnight on Thursday and put up two > Generalized Instant Runoff Voting[1] polls on Friday. The polls will be > open for a week and will determine the final terminology we'll use > across all of the documents. > > -- manu > > [1]https://www.opavote.com/methods#instant-runoff-voting >
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 15:08:28 UTC