- From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 21:44:33 -0700
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 6/7/16 7:23 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > The [Proposed VC Architecture] intro has been reworded so the definition isn't floating out there > like it was before. We want to introduce people to the term before we > use it in the doc, imho. Let me know what you think about the change. Yes, seems to flow now and I agree it works at the top of the document. > Based on your suggestions, I have: > > 1. Added a new section outlining benefits to all stakeholders. > 2. Moved Holders section up > 3. Reworded items that had identical language between different actors > 4. Moved items unique to each actor to the top of the list. > > https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-ig/commit/892c6b838811a05788a6bb223e51d4e9777be2df#diff-6225337de7b33ec38ef5910a8be616b0 > > Let me know if this works for you, Steven. Yes, order seems much better and I like the aggregation of common elements at the top. One point: I'm confused by the first item under "Inspectors" : "Better understanding of the user..." Who is the user? The Inspector? The Holder? Steven
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2016 04:45:05 UTC