- From: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 13:02:56 -0700
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
On 6/7/16 10:45 AM, msporny@digitalbazaar.com wrote: > Manu Sporny: 5 For consumer, 8 for inspector, 5 abstentions - > we do not have consensus > [snip] We may > have to revisit this. What about a credential 'Reader'? The activity of what we've called 'inspector' or 'consumer' is, perhaps most fundamentally, to read the credential. They do not change it in any way. It's like a book in that sense. You have people who publish the book, who hold the book in libraries, who own the book. You have people that the book is about -- if it's a biography (the 'subject'). Then an activity occurs that is someone reading the book. Many different people can be Readers. ? Steven > > Topic: Other items > > Manu Sporny: Adam is working on primer. > ... survey results are still changing. total of 55 orgs. > Carla Casilli: Want to share the definitions of terms that the > Connecting Credentials folks have been working on and how this > works with the Credentials Transparency Initiative as we move > toward defining TBD credential. It's focused on an edu > credentials. but might be worthwhile fodder. > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w5oOsGtrYDLq_b4WsAkRCO-XFdH2fsIZmbuUxUY2VVE/edit > Dave Longley: +1 To that note > Joe Andrieu: To answer a couple questions about "subject"... the > in some use cases the subject is not the holder, e.g., in cases > of birth/death > Matt Stone: Thanks all! > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2016 20:03:29 UTC