Re: VCTF Use Cases update

Not yet.  As that gels we will use the information to adjust the priorities
/ phases of the various requirements.  At least, that's my thinking.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

>
> > On Jan 26, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@halindrome.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > As we discussed briefly in the call today, we are gaining traction on
> the use cases document.  Gregg, Brian, Daniel, and I will be working on it
> going forward.
> >
> > The general approach I have taken to get this rolling is:
> >       • Start from the CCG use case document at [1]
>
> Hi Shane,
>
> Is there emerging consensus from interviews on core use cases (that may be
> a subset of the CG use cases doc)?
>
> Ian
>
>
> >       • Restructure to be more like the Web Payments Working Group use
> cases document at [2]
> >       • Organize around the major operations that can be peformed on /
> with a Verifiable Claim.
> >       • Extract core requirements with associated use cases from the CCG
> Google Doc use case document [3] and the CCG anonymized use cases that came
> in from the industry survey as reflected at [4]
> >       • In parallel, write up a *simple* illustration of a basic flow
> for a Verifiable Claim in the wild that we can use as an introduction to
> the concepts.
> > There is still a lot of work to do here.  I will be coordinating closely
> with the other volunteer editors. We are operating on github, using
> branches and pull requests.  Feel free to observe, comment, or assist!
> >
> > [1] http://www.opencreds.org/specs/source/use-cases
> > [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/web-payments-use-cases/
> > [3]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GySrTXAYpwa4vDPsGE3BMA42FwIAqAyLGigKuKUTGks/edit#
> > [4] http://opencreds.org/presentations/2015/w3c-tpac/anonymized.html
> > --
> > -Shane
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>
>
>
>


-- 
-Shane

Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2016 21:06:33 UTC