Re: Revised Verifiable Claims WG Charter (RC-2) (was Re: Problem statement)

Actually....

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:45 AM, David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>
wrote:

>
>
>
> Three comments on this:
> i) Specific processors will presumably be controlled by the user sending
> the VC to the chosen inspector, so this is quite straightforward
> ii) We currently do not say anything about specific periods of time as
> far as I am aware, so there is a mismatch here between your definition
> and the model
>

See the use cases; H.4 [1]


> iii) I would like to add to the end of your proposal 'and ensure that
> the credentials do not contain correlating identifiers' (notice that I
> specifically said credential rather than claim in this respect)
>

Friendly amendment: and ensure that the credentials are not required to
contain correlating identifiers.

[1] http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-ig/VCTF/use-cases/#uneed_H_4


-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops

Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 16:08:54 UTC