+1 Adrian On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com> wrote: > Good idea. I have submitted a comment to that issue. > > On 16 April 2015 at 12:36, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie < >> adrian@hopebailie.com> wrote: >> >>> Personally I support the suggestion of having a Credentials class where >>> the type is defined by a property that is a URI as opposed to sub-classing >>> Credential. >>> (The spec may define a type such as PasswordCredential identified by a >>> URI like http://w3c.org/webappsec/credential/#passwordcredential or >>> similar.) >>> Similarly, each FederatedCredential from each provider would be >>> identified by it's own URI. >>> This means there is no need for an "acceptPasswords" option either. >>> >> >> David filed a bug with suggestions at >> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/issues/256 >> >> Why don't we take this focused portion of the thread there to hammer out >> something that we might be happy with going forward? >> >> -mike >> >> -- >> Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest >> >> Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, >> Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der >> Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth >> Flores >> (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) >> > >
Received on Friday, 17 April 2015 00:39:42 UTC