RE: 29 Nov meeting [Was: We'd like to schedule a teleconf on TPAC 2012 discussion - proposed agenda and dates]

I'd like to include some discussion on how to advertise a group's elected practices, which, in my opinion, are of equal importance to the charter.  For groups that do not have any offical practices,  we need a prominently displayed warning of the perils that could lie ahead.  Without such a warning, participants are likely to assume conventional rules of W3C good behavior are in play.

I suggest we add this topic next to "Templates for good practice" in the agenda.

Thanks


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 6:42 AM
> To: Coralie Mercier
> Cc: public-council@w3.org
> Subject: 29 Nov meeting [Was: We'd like to schedule a teleconf on TPAC 2012
> discussion - proposed agenda and dates]
> 
> 
> On 15 Nov 2012, at 2:15 AM, Coralie Mercier wrote:
> 
> >
> > Dear Members of the Council
> >
> > Following discussion of CGs during TPAC 2012 earlier this month, we would
> like to convene a meeting of the council to review some of the topics covered
> and next steps:
> >
> > 1. Policy:
> >    Chair selection algorithm
> >    Update on some copyright topics
> > 2. Communications:
> >    Distinction between WG and CG products 3. Education:
> >    Templates for good practices (e.g., charter template) 4.
> > Infrastructure:
> >    Upcoming redesign and seeking beta-testers
> >
> > We set up a poll for when to organize the meeting; please express your
> preferences for the proposed dates/times for late November.
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Given the poll results, the call will be:
> 
>  29 November 2012
>  Noon ET for 1 hour
>  Bridge: +1 617 761 6200 code 2686 (COUN)
>  IRC: irc.w3.org #council
> 
> For the "chair selection algorithm" agenda item, here are some ideas:
>  http://www.w3.org/community/council/wiki/Chair_selection
> 
> For the education agenda item, I will mention the Modern Guide project and
> ask people to suggest templates they think would be useful.
> 
> For the communications agenda item, some of the discussion will include:
> 
>  * Existing mechanisms (document requirements [1], requirement in process
> not to create confusion with standards)
>  * Using a word other than "Final" for "Final Specification Agreement" and
> "Final Report"
>  * Use of the word "Report" (other than in titles) to refer to CG documents.
>  * Additional suggestions for further distinguishing group products.
> 
> Ian
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/reports/reqs/
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447
>

Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 20:32:22 UTC