Re: Feb 2013 edition of "Standards for Web Applications on Mobile: current state and roadmap"

Instead of Broken Medal, probably simply a Silver Medal would do the trick
(or Chocolate Medal ?)

My two cents

Mohamed


On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>wrote:

> Le lundi 04 mars 2013 à 15:17 +0100, Tobie Langel a écrit :
> > FYI. I see a couple of specs we mention as only partially addressing
> > requirements in Section 5[1] that are present in your document but
> > don't get a Coremob medal (e.g. full-sreen, orientation lock).
>
> Indeed, I hesitated on whether they should get the medal or not...
>
> > This makes sense but at the same time seems to indicate that we don't
> > really care about them. Which is exactly the opposite of the message
> > we're trying to get through.
> >
> > Would maybe adding a Coremob medal broken in half convey our intention
> > better?
>
> Hmm... Maybe, although something broken might convey the opposite idea
> as well... If anyone feel like proposing something, the SVG I've used
> for the medals is at:
> http://www.w3.org/2013/02/mobile-web-app-state/coremob.svg
>
> Dom
>
>
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €

Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 09:19:13 UTC