W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Feb 2013 edition of "Standards for Web Applications on Mobile: current state and roadmap"

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:18:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAK2GfEu8dURj7Pis+Bd3=K4TDc5CbuVX5u_U9zf55cSbmEU6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org Mobile" <public-coremob@w3.org>
Instead of Broken Medal, probably simply a Silver Medal would do the trick
(or Chocolate Medal ?)

My two cents

Mohamed


On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>wrote:

> Le lundi 04 mars 2013 à 15:17 +0100, Tobie Langel a écrit :
> > FYI. I see a couple of specs we mention as only partially addressing
> > requirements in Section 5[1] that are present in your document but
> > don't get a Coremob medal (e.g. full-sreen, orientation lock).
>
> Indeed, I hesitated on whether they should get the medal or not...
>
> > This makes sense but at the same time seems to indicate that we don't
> > really care about them. Which is exactly the opposite of the message
> > we're trying to get through.
> >
> > Would maybe adding a Coremob medal broken in half convey our intention
> > better?
>
> Hmm... Maybe, although something broken might convey the opposite idea
> as well... If anyone feel like proposing something, the SVG I've used
> for the medals is at:
> http://www.w3.org/2013/02/mobile-web-app-state/coremob.svg
>
> Dom
>
>
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 09:19:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:47 UTC