W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Are We Done Yet? [Was: Re: Minutes - Coremob 2012 is "final"]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:55:51 -0500
Message-ID: <510A85F7.1090306@nokia.com>
To: "ext SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
CC: "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On 1/31/13 9:48 AM, ext SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
>
> I thought that was the raison d'Ítre of webplatform.org. Surely we don't
> want a duplicated effort.
>
> Bryan: that can be considered, e.g. re fitness for purpose, but AFAIK has not been discussed yet in CoreMob. But wouldn't moving stakeholder discussion to there also compete with the CG concept, and devalue it?

No, I think focusing developers to webplatform.org is the most efficient 
use of resources.

> There are also key rules/procedure differences between the CG's and webplatform.org.

Well, I consider that a bug that needs to be fixed and if there really 
are mobile-specific aspects of a spec/API, that be called-out in the 
appropriate documentation at webplatform.org.

-Cheers, AB
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:56:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:47 UTC