W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > January 2013

RE: "Pre-Final" Draft of Coremob - 2012 and dial-in details for telecon to advance to "Final"

From: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:44:32 +0000
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext Jo Rabin <jo@linguafranca.org>
CC: "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
Message-ID: <59A39E87EA9F964A836299497B686C351093CC1B@WABOTH9MSGUSR8D.ITServices.sbc.com>
I agree LC status would be a good indicator to show, as of the time of the publication.

I also recommend that the latest /TR/ version be referenced. I know that some specs go a long time before /TR/ publication but that seems to be just a W3C process alignment issue. If what's been implemented in multiple browsers is not reflected in a /TR/ version, then that needs to be corrected by the specific group.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan 

-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 5:48 AM
To: ext Jo Rabin
Cc: public-coremob@w3.org
Subject: Re: "Pre-Final" Draft of Coremob - 2012 and dial-in details for telecon to advance to "Final"

On 1/23/13 2:02 PM, ext Jo Rabin wrote:
> [1] http://coremob.github.com/coremob-2012/ED-coremob-20130123.html

It seems like the Last Call state is significant enough in W3C that it 
should be reflected in the tables so I'm wondering why that hasn't been 
done. (D3E and IDB are LCs).

BTW, some of the references reflect old or really old versions: 
Selectors API v1 (2008), CORS (2009), File API, IDB, Web Storage, Web 
Workers, XHR (2008).

-AB
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 15:46:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:47 UTC