W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Next steps for Coremob-2012 and the group.

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:29:20 +0000
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
CC: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "ext SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F9981AFB970564408FEB7DFCF62D440843701FCB@PRN-MBX01-4.TheFacebook.com>
On 1/22/13 5:23 PM, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org> wrote:

>Le mardi 22 janvier 2013 à 16:18 +0000, Tobie Langel a écrit :
>> >Le mardi 22 janvier 2013 à 10:26 -0500, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
>> >> Re the data in the "W3C Test Framework" column of the "CoreMob 2012"
>> >> Tab, the data is an absolute number of tests. In addition to that
>> >> number, I think it would also be useful to get a sense of the level
>>of
>> >> the test suite's "done-ness". For example: the test suite is
>> >> sufficiently complete to test CR exit criteria, the test suite is
>> >> partially complete, contributions needed, etc.
>> >
>> >FWIW, I've tried to do that analysis as part of my "state of mobile web
>> >standards" document http://www.w3.org/2012/11/mobile-web-app-state/ ,
>> >marking the test suites coverage on a mostly-guess basis. I would love
>> >to instead get that info from the groups themselves :)
>> 
>> Or better yet, automate the whole process.
>
>That would be much better indeed, but requires a significantly bigger
>investment too :)

Agreed. Yet there's a tipping point where automation becomes cheaper.
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 16:29:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:47 UTC