W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Next steps for Coremob-2012 and the group.

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:26:36 -0500
Message-ID: <50FEAFAC.8050602@nokia.com>
To: "ext SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
CC: "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On 1/18/13 7:22 PM, ext SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
>
> There is a Web Testing meeting in Mountain View on Jan 29 to which we 
> will contribute an analysis of current test coverage per CoreMob 2012. 
> This is intended to help in planning tactical efforts to close the 
> gaps. I’ve put a draft of the analysis on the CoreMob wiki [1]. The 
> linked spreadsheet includes:
>
> ·How CoreMob-referenced specs/requirements are covered by:
>
> oRingmark
>
> otests available under the W3C Test Framework [2]
>
> oother tests hosted by W3C and elsewhere
>

This is a real nice document Bryan - thanks for sharing it!

Re the data in the "W3C Test Framework" column of the "CoreMob 2012" 
Tab, the data is an absolute number of tests. In addition to that 
number, I think it would also be useful to get a sense of the level of 
the test suite's "done-ness". For example: the test suite is 
sufficiently complete to test CR exit criteria, the test suite is 
partially complete, contributions needed, etc.

I realize such a status/summary may not be generally easy to determine 
but if people think it would be useful, perhaps we can divvy up the 
specs. I could help determine the summary of WebApps' test suites (and 
then add that info to [PubStatus]).

-AB

[PubStatus] 
<http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#API_Specifications>

> [1] http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/wiki/CoreMob2012_Test_Coverage
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 15:27:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:47 UTC