- From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:59:28 +0000
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On 1/11/13 12:49 PM, "James Graham" <jgraham@opera.com> wrote: >On 01/11/2013 12:27 PM, Tobie Langel wrote: >> On 1/11/13 4:14 AM, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 02:48 +0000, Tobie Langel wrote: >>>> On 1/11/13 3:33 AM, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> wrote: >>>>> I'm wondering if any of the following specifications should be >>>>>included >>>>> in the profile as well: >>>>> - GIF, PNG, and/or JPEG >>>> Interesting. Worried about this as much as I'm worried about >>>>specifying >>>> codecs. >>> >>> I didn't mean to imply it would be easy :) >> >> >> I think we'll leave image and font formats out of the picture for now. > >Well for practical purposes a graphical browser that doesn't support >GIF/PNG/JPEG is useless, so I don't see what the problem is in >acknowledging this fact. > >On the other hand a graphical browser that doesn't support GIF/PNG/JPEG >is clearly useless, so what it says in the Core Mobile document won't >have any effect in this case. Ya, I wholeheartedly agree on both counts. This doesn't really matter and won't change anything. If there's consensus to add these, then lets do it. I just don't want to make this a blocker for publishing the spec. --tobie
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 12:02:14 UTC