W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Next steps for Coremob-2012 and the group.

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:59:28 +0000
To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
Message-ID: <F9981AFB970564408FEB7DFCF62D4408436FBF2A@PRN-MBX01-4.TheFacebook.com>
On 1/11/13 12:49 PM, "James Graham" <jgraham@opera.com> wrote:

>On 01/11/2013 12:27 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
>> On 1/11/13 4:14 AM, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 02:48 +0000, Tobie Langel wrote:
>>>> On 1/11/13 3:33 AM, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org> wrote:
>>>>> I'm wondering if any of the following specifications should be
>>>>> in the profile as well:
>>>>> - GIF, PNG, and/or JPEG
>>>> Interesting. Worried about this as much as I'm worried about
>>>> codecs.
>>> I didn't mean to imply it would be easy :)
>> I think we'll leave image and font formats out of the picture for now.
>Well for practical purposes a graphical browser that doesn't support
>GIF/PNG/JPEG is useless, so I don't see what the problem is in
>acknowledging this fact.
>On the other hand a graphical browser that doesn't support GIF/PNG/JPEG
>is clearly useless, so what it says in the Core Mobile document won't
>have any effect in this case.

Ya, I wholeheartedly agree on both counts. This doesn't really matter and
won't change anything.

If there's consensus to add these, then lets do it. I just don't want to
make this a blocker for publishing the spec.

Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 12:02:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:48 UTC