W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > February 2013

RE: Final draft of Coremob 2012

From: Suresh Chitturi <schitturi@rim.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 21:03:07 +0000
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
CC: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8B118C943801754098C9B36B567EABA3B001FE@XMB103ADS.rim.net>
>From: Tobie Langel [mailto:tobie@fb.com]
>Subject: Re: Final draft of Coremob 2012
>
>On 1/31/13 8:15 AM, "Jo Rabin" <jo@linguafranca.org> wrote:
>
>>Thank you very much Tobie, please flip away and I'll push my button.
>
>There you go:
>http://coremob.github.com/coremob-2012/FR-coremob-20130131.html

Notice that there is a mismatch between the name of the report of the title of the document.
Naming the title to "Specification" can be misleading, and a better name would be "Final Community Group Report".

There were some discussions on this particular topic during the TPAC and post TPAC, and I believe the conclusion from that is the same i.e. not to use the term specification for CG deliverables.
Ian, can probably shed some light?:)

Regards,
Suresh

>
>Diff: http://bit.ly/U2MoEt
>
>--tobie



---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 21:03:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:47 UTC