Re: Inclusion of overflowScrolling in coremob specification

On 10/10/12 4:59 PM, "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com> wrote:

>OK, I agree with your general point. I am interested to see where the
>existence of these libraries shows a need for spec enhancements (and
>how/where that gets initiated).

Absolutely (see doc.querySelectorAll for example). This work belongs in
the relevant WGs.

--tobie

Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 15:06:18 UTC