- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:54:51 +0100
- To: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "<jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>" <jeanfrancois.moy@orange.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On Friday, 30 March 2012 at 00:14, Scott Wilson wrote: > > On 29 Mar 2012, at 23:58, Tobie Langel wrote: > > > On 3/30/12 12:31 AM, "Scott Wilson" <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com (mailto:scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > However, no one I've spoken to has ever complained about the problem > > > being it uses uncool XML, I've just seen it from some guy commenting on > > > Bruce's blog. > > > > > > > > JSON vs. XML is an issue I've heard again and again. > > > > > > Just FYI, I don't have a personal opinion about this, nor would it matter > > if I did. > > > > I just care to reach consensus and to end the current madness[1]. > > +! > > (If the question is "XML or JSON?" the answer is "yes") I'm keen to JFDI in regards to making the JSON serialisation (just to see if it makes any difference).
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2012 23:55:25 UTC