W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > June 2012

Re: ISSUE-28: Should the HTTP11 reference go to bis?

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 07:53:21 -0600
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+e=ja99s-3TXP0pVh21p1N6WkUM40RTr1fknqznbETJ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
Cc: "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 1:54 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com> wrote:

> Not IMO. HTTPbis is too early in the dev cycle and the impact on existing
> services has not been fully analyzed. For specific sites that want to use
> it that's fine, but it is not ready as a general requirement.
> Bryan Sullivan | AT&T


I agree. Too early.


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group Issue Tracker [mailto:
> sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 05:16 PM
> To: public-coremob@w3.org <public-coremob@w3.org>
> Subject: ISSUE-28: Should the HTTP11 reference go to bis?
>
> ISSUE-28: Should the HTTP11 reference go to bis?
>
> http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/track/issues/28
>
> Raised by:
> On product:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 13:54:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:46 UTC