W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > June 2012

Re: coremob-ISSUE-8: No spec to point to for Full-screen mode. [COREMOB-1]

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:57:54 +0000
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>, "Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CC066DD4.8EA2E%tobie@fb.com>
On 6/19/12 2:04 PM, "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:24:12 +0200, Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com> wrote:
>> On 6/19/12 11:11 AM, "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com> wrote:
>>> So being able to request a view-mode? That's in the widgets P&C
>>> it sounds like there is a goal to seperate config from packaging and be
>>> able to use live web content. That has been expressed before (and is
>>> conceptual difference between widgets on the one hand appcache and the
>>> proposed JSON packaging manifest offers on the other, the rest being a
>>> matter of syntax and implementation quality).
>> I think we agree this is the way forward.
>>> The place for that might be the native-web-apps community group.
>> or the WebApps WG? I'm confused.
>Either. Web Apps agreed to take work that is ready-ish for
>standardisation, while letting the CG work on things that are basically
>new ideas. We should just agree where to go with this.

I don't care either way. Are all stakeholders in both groups?

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 15:58:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:47 UTC