W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > June 2012

Re: [F2F] Agenda

From: Jet Villegas <jet@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
Cc: W3C CoreMob CG <public-coremob@w3.org>
Message-ID: <31073264.7544657.1339794836677.JavaMail.root@mozilla.com>
Level 0 needs some more work that we should discuss. In particular, it's not clear what passing Level 0 really means. I'm concerned that Level 1 will follow the same route, leading to feeble implementations that "pass." I think the best way to avoid that is to apply a high level of rigor and discipline to Level 0. Let's list the Level 0 apps/sites that actually use those features in a significant way and measure their real-world performance against the browsers that claim to pass Level 0. I expect some interesting findings for us here.

-- Jet

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tobie Langel" <tobie@fb.com>
To: "W3C CoreMob CG" <public-coremob@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 4:30:13 AM
Subject: [F2F] Agenda


Just added a tentative agenda for the F2F on the wiki:


Comments welcomed.

Received on Friday, 15 June 2012 21:14:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:47 UTC