W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-coremob@w3.org > April 2012

Acknowledging prefixes as not a pass, was Re: Purpose of ring 0 and vendor prefixes (was: Re: Ringmark is now open source)

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:46:19 +0100
To: "public-coremob@w3.org" <public-coremob@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5F94012673E24519A4DE012287FB7409@marcosc.com>


On Monday, 30 April 2012 at 11:49, Henri Sivonen wrote:

> To address this problem, rather than have prefixed and unprefixed
> versions of a feature as different buckets, the test suite could have
> three outcomes for each test: feature absent (gray), only prefixed
> (red; not counted towards score; doesn't unlock the next ring) and
> pass (green; feature supported without prefix). This way, the presence
> of prefixed features could be acknowledged while still treating them
> as not passing the suite.

This sounds like a pretty good solution, IMO. 

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Monday, 30 April 2012 11:46:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 19 April 2013 17:36:46 UTC