W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > February 2011

Editorial Errors in Understanding WCAG

From: Tomas Caspers <tcaspers@me.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:57:26 +0100
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-id: <0CB232C6-214F-46ED-BE21-EB423A884689@me.com>
Dear all,

during the translation of the latest version of "Understanding WCAG" <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20101014/complete.html> into German we found some errors:


> Because different image editing applications default to different pixel densities (ex. 72 PPI or 96 PPI), specifying point sizes for fonts from within an image editing application can be unreliable when it comes to presenting text at a specific size.

What is ex in this context supposed to mean? Or should it read e.g.? 


> For example, for a 72 PPI image, an author would need to use approximately 19 pt and 24 pt font sizes in order to successfully present large-scale images of text to a user.

Shouldn't "large-scale" not be in front of tex? ..."to successfully present images of  large-scale text to a user."

Thanks for clarification,

Tomas Caspers
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 13:58:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:13 UTC