- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:56:40 -0700
- To: sheena.mccullagh@blueyonder.co.uk
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:56 AM, <sheena.mccullagh@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > > Name: Sheena McCullagh > Email: sheena.mccullagh@blueyonder.co.uk > Affiliation: Member of the public > Document: W2 > Item Number: (none selected) > Part of Item: > Comment Type: general comment > Summary of Issue: Lack of showing amendments > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > Some of us struggle to spot changes/proof read. It would therefore have been exceptionally useful if the amendments/changes in the 8 July drafts had been marked to show the differences between those documents and the existing WAIG2. > > Proposed Change: > Please mark amendments/changes in some way - including where you have 'repaired' broken links. > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ The draft documents released for public review contain links to diff-marked versions: Understanding WCAG 2.0, Single file diff-marked version showing revisions since 11 December 2008, http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20100708/complete-diff.html Techniques for WCAG 2.0, Single file diff-marked version showing revisions since 11 December 2008, http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100708/complete-diff.html Unfortunately, the diff mark-up will not catch links whose only change is to their targets. While we believe that all links were reviewed and were either working or removed when the draft documents were released, we have no way of ensuring that those links continue to stay unbroken. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 30 July 2010 20:57:10 UTC