On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:14 PM, W Reagan<wreagan1@yahoo.com> wrote: > Please take a look at http://www.mardiros.net/css-layout.html, , > http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/08/tables-or-css-layout/, > http://www.apaddedcell.com/11-practical-reasons-to-use-css-for-layout , > and http://www.apaddedcell.com/11-practical-reasons-to-use-css-for-layout > and remove "tables are meaningful", and replace it with CSS, li or div. > > As Madros points out there are bugs in Internet Explorer when viewing a > layout table, that a table layout "breaks". This should not be meaningful.. > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ In this context, "tables" refers to data tables. We will include updated language for the intent of SC 1.3.2 in the next draft. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working GroupReceived on Friday, 28 August 2009 22:35:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 17 July 2011 06:13:29 GMT