- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:34:34 -0700
- To: W Reagan <wreagan1@yahoo.com>
- Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:14 PM, W Reagan<wreagan1@yahoo.com> wrote: > Please take a look at http://www.mardiros.net/css-layout.html, , > http://www.joedolson.com/articles/2007/08/tables-or-css-layout/, > http://www.apaddedcell.com/11-practical-reasons-to-use-css-for-layout , > and http://www.apaddedcell.com/11-practical-reasons-to-use-css-for-layout > and remove "tables are meaningful", and replace it with CSS, li or div. > > As Madros points out there are bugs in Internet Explorer when viewing a > layout table, that a table layout "breaks". This should not be meaningful.. > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ In this context, "tables" refers to data tables. We will include updated language for the intent of SC 1.3.2 in the next draft. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 22:35:14 UTC