W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > September 2008

"minimum" or "enhanced"?

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22:22:22 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20080902222222.6D0BF6B62A@kent.w3.org>


Name: Makoto Ueki
Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
Affiliation: JIS Working Group
Document: W2
Item Number: Success Criterion 1.4.6
Part of Item: 
Comment Type: editorial
Summary of Issue: "minimum" or "enhanced"?
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
In the section of "Incidental", it reads "..., have no minimum contrast requirement". It should be "enhanced" instead of "minimum" as this is the SC for "Contrast (Enhanced)".

Proposed Change:
Change "..., have no minimum contrast requirement" to "..., have no enhanced contrast requirement".
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2008 22:22:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 17 July 2011 06:13:26 GMT