W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > October 2008

Re: 18 point or 14 point bold

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:45:42 -0700
Message-ID: <824e742c0810231845x54cb7324tcf8ed10a0f58def@mail.gmail.com>
To: noreply@w3.org
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:54 AM, WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> Name: Makoto Ueki
> Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
> Affiliation: JIS Working Group
> Document: W2
> Item Number: Appendix A: Glossary
> Part of Item:
> Comment Type: question
> Summary of Issue: 18 point or 14 point bold
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> What is "common pixel sizes available today"? 1024 x 768?
>
> Proposed Change:
> We need more concrete premise for the users display.
>
>
================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
Since the note relates to the definition of large scale text, we have
removed this sentence "This success criterion is based on common pixel
sizes available today." Additional detail about why 14 point bold and
18 point were chosen can be found in the understanding 1.4.3 and 1.4.6
documents.

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 01:46:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 17 July 2011 06:13:26 GMT