Re: "must be presented in non-text format"

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:10 AM, WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> Name: Makoto Ueki
> Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
> Affiliation: JIS Working Group
> Document: W2
> Item Number: Success Criterion 1.1.1
> Part of Item:
> Comment Type: editorial
> Summary of Issue: "must be presented in non-text format"
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> "must be presented in non-text format" which is defined in Glossary can be changed to "would be invalid if presented in text" as defined in Grossary. The phrase is used just one time.
>
> Proposed Change:
> Just replace "must be presented in non-text format" with "would be invalid if presented in text" and remove "must be presented in non-text format" from Glossary.
>
>

================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
We are updating the definition as proposed.

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group