W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > October 2008

Re: "must be presented in non-text format"

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:50:33 -0700
Message-ID: <824e742c0810052150r55c5ba2dlc5d13090f8a0f4b2@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Makoto Ueki" <makoto.ueki@gmail.com>
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:10 AM, WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> Name: Makoto Ueki
> Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
> Affiliation: JIS Working Group
> Document: W2
> Item Number: Success Criterion 1.1.1
> Part of Item:
> Comment Type: editorial
> Summary of Issue: "must be presented in non-text format"
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> "must be presented in non-text format" which is defined in Glossary can be changed to "would be invalid if presented in text" as defined in Grossary. The phrase is used just one time.
>
> Proposed Change:
> Just replace "must be presented in non-text format" with "would be invalid if presented in text" and remove "must be presented in non-text format" from Glossary.
>
>

================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
We are updating the definition as proposed.

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Monday, 6 October 2008 04:51:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 17 July 2011 06:13:26 GMT