W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > March 2008

Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Working Draft of December, 2007

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:19:14 -0700
Message-ID: <824e742c0803101719h85f79fbk1539009cb2bd680e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Koch" <koch@w3development.de>
Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org

Dear Johannes Koch,

Thank you for your comments on the 11 Dec 2007 Last Call Working Draft
of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20071211). The WCAG Working Group
has reviewed all comments received on the December draft. Before we
proceed to implementation, we would like to know whether we have
understood your comments correctly and whether you are satisfied with
our resolutions.

Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and reply to
us by 31 March 2008 at public-comments-wcag20@w3.org to say whether
you accept them or to discuss additional concerns you have with our
response. Note that this list is publicly archived.

Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted and our
resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a link to the
archived copy of your original comment on
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/, and may
also include links to the relevant changes in the WCAG 2.0 Editor's
Draft of 10 March 2008 at
http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20080310/.

Note that if you still strongly disagree with our resolution on an issue,
you have the opportunity to file a formal objection (according to
3.3.2 of the W3C Process, at
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#WGArchiveMinorityViews)
to public-comments-wcag20@w3.org. Formal objections will be reviewed
during the candidate recommendation transition meeting with the W3C
Director, unless we can come to agreement with you on a resolution in
advance of the meeting.

Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we
cannot always do exactly what each commenter requests, all of the
comments are valuable to the development of WCAG 2.0.


Regards,

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact

On behalf of the WCAG Working Group

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 1: missing failure list for SC 2.1.2 including F10
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0048.html
(Issue ID: 2370)
Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED
----------------------------
Original Comment:
----------------------------

No list of common failures, whereas the Techniques document has F10
for failing sc2.1.2

Proposed Change:
add list of common failures listing F10

---------------------------------------------
Response from Working Group:
---------------------------------------------

Thank you. We have fixed this error.

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 2: missing failure list for SC 3.3.2 including F82
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0049.html
(Issue ID: 2371)
Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED
----------------------------
Original Comment:
----------------------------

No list of common failures, whereas the Techniques document has F82
for failing sc3.3.2

Proposed Change:
add list of common failures listing F82

---------------------------------------------
Response from Working Group:
---------------------------------------------

Thank you. We have fixed this error.

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 3: Wrong number for Understanding 1.4.7, Sufficient Techniques
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0041.html
(Issue ID: 2363)
Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED
----------------------------
Original Comment:
----------------------------

Numbering in the headline is wrong: "Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.6",
must be 1.4.7

Proposed Change:
"Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.6" -> "Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.7"

---------------------------------------------
Response from Working Group:
---------------------------------------------

Thank you. We have fixed this error.

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 4: technique G140 listed under failures
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0047.html
(Issue ID: 2369)
Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED
----------------------------
Original Comment:
----------------------------

"Failures for SC 1.3.1" lists technique G140

Proposed Change:
remove G140 from list of failures

---------------------------------------------
Response from Working Group:
---------------------------------------------

Thank you. We have corrected this error.

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 5: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.9 Advisory Techniques
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0046.html
(Issue ID: 2368)
Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED
----------------------------
Original Comment:
----------------------------

Numbering is wrong: "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.8", must be 1.4.9

Proposed Change:
"Advisory Techniques for 1.4.8" -> "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.9"

---------------------------------------------
Response from Working Group:
---------------------------------------------

Thank you. We have fixed this error.

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 6: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.7 Advisory Techniques
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0042.html
(Issue ID: 2364)
Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED
----------------------------
Original Comment:
----------------------------

Numbering is wrong: "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.6", must be 1.4.7

Proposed Change:
"Advisory Techniques for 1.4.6" -> "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7"

---------------------------------------------
Response from Working Group:
---------------------------------------------

Thank you. We have fixed this error.

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 7: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.8 Sufficient Techniques
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0043.html
(Issue ID: 2365)
Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED
----------------------------
Original Comment:
----------------------------

Numbering is wrong: "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7", must be 1.4.8

Proposed Change:
"Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7" -> "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.8"

---------------------------------------------
Response from Working Group:
---------------------------------------------

Thank you. We have fixed this error.

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 8: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.8 Advisory Techniques
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0043.html
(Issue ID: 2366)
Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED
----------------------------
Original Comment:
----------------------------

Numbering is wrong: "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7", must be 1.4.8

Proposed Change:
"Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7" -> "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.8"

---------------------------------------------
Response from Working Group:
---------------------------------------------

Thank you. We have fixed this error.

----------------------------------------------------------
Comment 9: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.9 Sufficient Techniques
Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0045.html
(Issue ID: 2367)
Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED
----------------------------
Original Comment:
----------------------------

Numbering is wrong: Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.8", must be 1.4.9

Proposed Change:
Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.8" -> Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.9"

---------------------------------------------
Response from Working Group:
---------------------------------------------

Thank you. We have fixed this error.
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:19:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 17 July 2011 06:13:25 GMT